<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Time To Blog &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rajeshwar.net/blog/category/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rajeshwar.net/blog</link>
	<description>(but check back for updates!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Redbox Model</title>
		<link>http://www.rajeshwar.net/blog/the-redbox-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rajeshwar.net/blog/the-redbox-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollardollarbillyall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rajeshwar.net/blog/the-redbox-model/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the NYTimes over the weekend, Randall Stross noted the surging popularity of Redbox as a low-tech video rental alternative to Netflix and/or streaming content.&#160; The president of Redbox (a Netflix veteran) suggests that they owe their success to &#8220;lower-income households with large families&#8221;.&#160; But the question is &#8211; why?&#160; Why does Redbox bear the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the NYTimes over the weekend, Randall Stross noted the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/business/12digi.html?ref=movies">surging popularity of Redbox</a> as a low-tech video rental alternative to Netflix and/or streaming content.&nbsp; The president of Redbox (a Netflix veteran) suggests that they owe their success to &#8220;lower-income households with large families&#8221;.&nbsp; But the question is &#8211; why?&nbsp; Why does Redbox bear the stamp of middle America while Netflix is for the trendier crowds?</p>
<p>My hypothesis: because it doesn&#8217;t require a lifestyle shift.&nbsp; Netflix is a subscription service.&nbsp; Streaming video requires that you buy and connect television hardware, get a better internet connection, or upgrade your computer in some fashion.&nbsp; Redbox works exactly like a video rental store, except cheaper.&nbsp; You go to a physical location, get a physical disk, and return it to the same location.&nbsp; There are no forms to fill out and no need to adjust your view of the world to incorporate the concept of mailing disks back and forth.&nbsp; There&#8217;s no need to figure out why your internet is so slow, no problem if you&#8217;re watching the video in the car.&nbsp; You don&#8217;t need to give Steve Jobs your credit card number, install iTunes, or even have a computer.</p>
<p>The most popular movies on Redbox are safe, family favorites because play-it-safe, traditional families are exactly the type to use Redbox.&nbsp; They just want to watch a movie, without the hassle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rajeshwar.net/blog/the-redbox-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

